Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Geri Kabul Anlaşmasının Hukuki Yönden Analizi

Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği “AB” , düzensiz göçle daha etkin mücadele etmek adına, “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti ile Avrupa Birliği Arasında İzinsiz İkamet Eden Kişilerin Geri Kabulüne İlişkin Anlaşma”yı “GKA” 16 Aralık 2013’te imzalarken; GKA, 1 Ekim 2014 itibarıyla yürürlüğe girmiştir. GKA, özünde, karşılıklılık temelinde, Türkiye veya AB üyesi bir devlet açısından düzensiz göçmen olan vatandaş, üçüncü ülke vatandaşı veya vatansız kişinin geri kabulü veya transit geçişi ile ilgili koşulları, esasları ve usulleri tespit etmektedir. İşte bu çalışma, gerek AB ve üyesi devletler gerek Türkiye hukuk düzeninin yeni kaynağı olan GKA’yı hukuki yönden analiz etmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Geri Kabul Anlaşması, Düzensiz Göç, Türkiye ile Avrupa

The Legal Analysis of Readmission Agreement Between Turkey and European Union

In order to combat irregular immigration more effectively, Turkey and European Union “EU” signed the “Agreement between Republic of Turkey and the European Union on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation” “RA” in 16 December 2013 and RA entered into force in 1 October 2014. In sum, RA determines the conditions, essentials and procedure related to the readmission or transit of nationals, third country nationals and stateless persons who are irregular migrants in relation to Turkey or EU Member States. This paper, hence, analyses RA, which is a new source of the legal order of the EU and its Member States on the one hand, and Turkey on the other hand, from a legal point of view

Keywords:

Readmission Agreement, Irregular Immigration, Relations between,

PDF

___

Aust, Anthony. Handbook of International Law, 2d ed, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
Coleman, Nils. European Readmission Policy, Martinus Nijhoff, the Netherlands, 2008.
İnceoğlu, Sibel, ed. İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2013.
Peers, Steve. EU Justice and Home Affairs Law, 3d ed, , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
Abell, N Albuquerque. The Compatibility of Readmission Agreements with the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, International Journal of Refugee Law, Cilt: 11, Sayı: 1, 1999.
Baykal, Sanem & İlke Göçmen. Avrupa Birliği Hukukunun Kaynakları Bakımından Normlar Hiyerarşisi, Prof Dr Erdal Onara Armağan, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 2013.
Billet, Carole. EC Readmission Agreements: A Prime Instrument of the External Dimension of the EUs Fight against Irregular Immigration. An Assessment after Ten Years of Practice, European Journal of Migration and Law, Cilt: 12, Sayı: 1, 2010.
Dedja, Sokol. Human Rights in the EU Return Policy: The Case of the EU- Albania Relations, European Journal of Migration & Law, Cilt: 14, Sayı: 1, 2012.
Eisele, Katharina & Anja Wiesbrock. Enhancing Mobility in the European Neighborhood Policy? The Cases of Moldova and Georgia, Review of Central & East European Law, Cilt: 36, Sayı: 2, 2011.
Fekete, Liz. Accelerated removals: the human cost of EU deportation policies, Race Class, Cilt: 52, Sayı: 4, 2011.
Giuffré, Mariagiulia. Readmission Agreements and Refugee Rights: FromCritique to a Proposal, Refugee Survey Quarterly, Cilt: 32, Sayı: 3, 2013.
Göçmen, İlke & Orhan Ersun Civan. The Principle of Non-Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality with regard to Turkish Workers in the European Union and Union Workers in Turkey, Belgin Akçay & Şebnem Akipek Öcal, eds, Turkeys Integration into the European Union: Legal Dimension, Lexington Books, USA, 2013.
Gönenç, Levent & Selin Esen. Problem of the Application of Less Protective International Agreements in Domestic Legal Systems: Article 90 of the Turkish Constitution, The, European Journal of Law Reform, Cilt: 8, 2006.
Guild, Elspeth. Readmission Agreements, Steve Peers et al, eds, EU Immigration and Asylum Law (Text and Commentary): Second Revised Edition: Volume 2: EU Immigration Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2012.
Guild, Elspeth. Article 19 - Protection in the Event of Removal, Expulsion or Extradition, Steve Peers et al, eds, The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2014.
Hailbronner, Kay. Readmission Agreements and the Obligation on States under Public International Law to Readmit their Own and Foreign Nationals, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Cilt: 57, 1997.
İçduygu, Ahmet & Damla B Aksel. Two-to-Tango in Migration Diplomacy: Negotiating Readmission Agreement between the eu and Turkey, European Journal of Migration and Law, Cilt: 16, Sayı: 3, 2014.
Krieken, Peter Van. Return and Responsibility, International Migration, Cilt: 38, Sayı: 4, 2000.
Nicol, Andrew. From Dublin Convention to Dublin Regulation: A Progressive Move?, Anneliese Baldaccini, Elspeth Guild & Helen Toner, eds, Whose Freedom, Security and Justice?: EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, Hart, Oxford, 2007.
Öztürk, Neva Övünç. Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Şartında Yer Alan Sığınma Hakkının Tahlili, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3, Sayı: 2, 2012.
Phuong, Catherine. Building a Community Return Policy With Third Countries: An Equal Partnership?, Anneliese Baldaccini, Elspeth Guild & Helen Toner, eds, Whose Freedom, Security and Justice?: EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, Hart, Oxford, 2007.
Roig, Annabelle & Thomas Huddleston. EC Readmission Agreements: A Re-Evaluation of the Political Impasse, European Journal of Migration and Law, Cilt: 9, 2007.
Schieffer, Martin. Community Readmission Agreements with Third Countries - Objectives, Substance and Current State of Negotiations, European Journal of Migration and Law, Cilt: 5, 2003.
Trauner, Florian & Imke Kruse. EC Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements: A New Standard EU Foreign Policy Tool, European Journal of Migration and Law, Cilt: 10, 2008.
Wolff, Sarah. The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey, European Journal of Migration and Law, Cilt: 16, Sayı: 1, 2014.
Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. Readmission Policy in the European Union, European Parliaments Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs PE 425,632 (Brussels, 2010).
European Commission. Evaluation of EU Readmission Agreements, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council COM(2011) 76 final (Brussels, 2011).
European Commission. EU Readmission Agreements: State of Play (June 2011), (June 2011), online: _____http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home- affairs/what-we-do/policies/pdf/eu_readmission_agreements_en.pdf>.
European Commission. Statement by Cecilia Malmström on the ratification of the EU-Turkey readmission agreement by the Turkish Parliament (Statement/14/210), (26 June 2014), online: _____http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-210_en.htm>.
European Policy Centre. EU Readmission Agreements: Towards a More Strategic Approach that Respects Human Rights, Event Report S17/12 (Brussels, 2012).
Özcan, Mehmet et al. Türkiye - AB İlişkilerinde Geri Kabul: Hangi Şartlarda?, Uluslararası Stratejik Araştırmalar Kurumu 10-02 (Ankara, 2010).
Özsöz, Murat. Türk Vatandaşlarının Vizesiz Avrupa Yolculuğu: Vize Sorunu, Geri Kabul ve Sonrası, İKV Değerlendirme Notu 85 (İstanbul, 2014).
Strik, Tineke. Readmission Agreements: A Mechanism for Returning Irregular Migrants (Explanatory Memorandum), Report of the Committee on Migration, Refugees and Population Doc. 12168 (Strasbourg, 2010).
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanlığı. Türkiyenin Yasadışı Göçle Mücadelesi, (2011), online: _____http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkiye_nin- yasadisi-gocle-mucadelesi-.tr.mfa>.
Gillade, Kim. Readmission Agreements Concluded by the EU (Master Thesis, Universiteit Gent, 2011) [unpublished]. Mahkeme Kararları
Joined Cases 21 to 24/72 (Court of Justice) International Fruit Company NV and others v Produktschap voor Groenten en Fruit [1972] ECR 1219.
Case 181/73 (Court of Justice) R. & V. Haegeman v Belgian State [1974] ECR 449.
Case 12/86 (Court of Justice) Meryem Demirel v Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd [1987] ECR-3719.
Case 30/88 (Court of Justice) Greece v Commission [1988] ECR 3711.
App. 42367/98 (European Court of Human Rights) Ould Barar v. Sweden [1999].
App. 17341/03 (European Court of Human Rights) F. v. the United Kingdom [2004].
App. 13284/04 (European Court of Human Rights) Bader and Kanbor v. Sweden [2005] ECHR 2005-XI.
App. 27034/05 (European Court of Human Rights) Z. and T. v. United Kingdom [2006] ECHR 2006-III.
App. 13178/03 (European Court of Human Rights) Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium [2006] ECHR 2006-XI.
App. 30562/04 and 30566/04 (European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber)) S. and Marper v. United Kingdom [2008] ECHR 2008.
App. 30696/09 (European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber)) M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [2011] ECHR 2011.
App. 8139/09 (European Court of Human Rights) Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom [2012] ECHR 2012.

ISSN: 1303-2518
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2001
Yayıncı: Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi