___

• Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS Uygulamaları, İstanbul: İdeal Kültür.
• Aktaş, M. ve Şener, İ. (2012). Koşul Bağımlılık Kuramı, Sözen, H. C. ve Basım, H. N. (Der.), Örgüt Kuramı içinde (s. 91-116). İstanbul: Beta.
• Ark, A. H. (2008). Strategic Orientation and Business Performance Relationship With Focus On Business And Functional Level Strategy Fit: An Empirical Study On Turkish Enterprises, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Ashmos, D. P., Duchon, D. ve McDaniel, R. R. (2000). Organizational Responses To Complexity: The Effect On Organizational Performance, Journal of Change Management, 13 (6), 577-594.
• Aydeniz, E. Ş. (2009), Makroekonomik Göstergelerin Firmaların Finansal Performans Ölçütleri Üzerindeki Etkisinin Ölçülmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: IMKB’ ye Kote Gıda ve İçecek İşletmeleri Üzerine bir Uygulama, Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 27(2), 263-277.
• Bayraktar, E., Tatoğlu, E. (2010). Assessing The Link Between Strategy Choice And Operational Performance Of Turkish Companies, 14th International Research/Expert Conference ”Trends In The Development Of Machinery And Associated Technology” TMT 2010, Mediterranean Cruise, 11-18 September, 805-808.
• Budayan, C., Dikmen, İ., Birgönül, M.T. (2007). Türk İnşaat Sektöründe Stratejik Grup Analizi, 4. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, İstanbul: 139-148.
• Burns, T., Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management Of Innovation, London: Tavistock Publications.
• Burton, M. R., Lauridsen, J. & Obel, B. (2000). Fit and Misfits İn The Multi-Dimensional Contingency Model: An Organizational Change Perspective, Working Paper 1-2000, Denmark: LOK Resarch Center.
• Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy And Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, MA.
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role Of Strategic Choice, Sociology, 6: 1-22.
• Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P. & Varadarajan,, P. R. (1990). Strategic Types, Distinctive Marketing Competencies And Organizational Performance: A Multiple Measures-Based Study, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 365-383.
• Covin, J. G., Slevin, D.P. & Heeley, M. B. (2001). Strategic Decision Making in An İntuitive Vs. Technocratic Mode: Structural And Environmental Considerations, Journal of Business Research, 52, 51-67.
• Desarbo, W.S., Benedetto, C. A. D., Song, M. & Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting The Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships Between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, And Firm Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 47-74.
• Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D. & Hitt, M.A. (1990). Industry Effects And Strategy Management Research, Journal of Management, 27, 267-488.
• DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development Thory And Applications (2th. Edition), Sage Publications Inc. Doğan, T. (2008). Strateji Tipleri ve Stratejik Yönetim Süreçlerinin Firma Performansına Etkileri, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Gebze.
• Donaldson, L. (1996). For Cartenianism: Against Organizational Types And Quantum Jumps, In: For Positivist Organization Theory: Providing The Hard Core, London: Sage, pp. 108-129.
• Donaldson, L., (1987), Strategy And Structural Adjustment To Regain Fit And Performance: Indefence Of Contingency Theory. Journal of Management Studies 24 (1): 1-24.
• Donaldson, L. (2001), The Contingency Theory Of Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Doty, D.H., W.H. Glick. (1993). Fit, Equifinality, And Organizational Effectiveness: A Test Of Two Configurationally Theories, Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1196-1250.
• Drazin, R., Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative Forms Of Fit in Contingency Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (4), 514-539.
• Fiss, P. C. (2008). Configurations Of Strategy, Structure And Environment: A Fuzzy Set Analysis Of High Technology Firms, MIT BPS Conference, Cambridge: MA.
• Frederickson, J. W. (1986) The Strategic Decision Process And The Organizational Structure, Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 280-297.
• Garlichs, M. (2011). The Concept Of Strategic Fit. Hamburg: Herstellung: Diplomica Verlag GmbH. Gresov, C. (1989). Exploring Fit And Misfit With Multiple Contingencies, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 (3), 431-53.
• Güleş, H. K. (2001). Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli Sanayi İş- letmelerinde İleri İmalat Teknolojileri Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 1, 59-76.
• Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some Tests Of The Effectiveness and Functional Attirbutes of Miles And Snow’s Strategic Types, Academy of Management Journal, 26 (1), 5-26.
• Hatten, K. J., Schendel, D. E. (1977). Heterogeneity Within An İndustry: Firm Conduct İn The U. S. Brewing Industry, 1952-71, The Journal of Industrial Economics, XXVI (2), 97-113.
• Hughes, P., Morgan, R. E. (2008). Fitting Strategic Resources With Product-Market Strategy: Performance İmplications, Journal of Business Research, 61 (4), 323-31.
• Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J. Jr., Cavusgil,T. S. & Calantone, R. J. (2006). Knowledge as a Strategic Resource İn Supply Chains, Journal of Operations Management, 24 (5), 458-75.
• Kabadayi, S., Eyuboglu, N. & Thomas, G. P. (2007). The Performance İmplications Of Designing Multiple Channels to Fit With Strategy And Environment, Journal of Marketing, 71 (4), 195-211.
• Kamaşak, R. (2010). Jenerik Rekabet Stratejilerinin İşletme Karlılığı ve Pazar Performansına Etkisi, Yö- netim, 21 (65), 47-64.
• Ketchen, D. J., Thomas, J. B. & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational Configurations And Performance: A Comparison Of Theoretical Approaches, The Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1278-1313.
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1976). Some Top Management Styles, Their Context And Performance, Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7(4), 21-51.
• Kim, L., Lim, Y. (1988). Environment, Generic Strategies, and Performance in a Rapidly Developing Country: A Taxonomic Approach, Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 802-827.
• Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch J.W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and İntegration, Boston: Harvard University Press.
• Leblebici, D. N. (2005). Küresel Değişim Baskısına Karşı Türk Bürokrasisindeki Yapısal Uyum Çabalarının Yapısal Atalet Kavramı Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (1), 1-14.
• Lenz, R. T. (1980). Environment, Strategy, Organization Structure and Performance: Patterns in One Industry, Strategic Management Journal, 1 (3), 209- 226.
• Lindow, C. M. (2012). A Strategic Fit Perspectives On Family Firm Performance, Springer Gabler, Online ISBN 978-3-8349-7167-8.
• Marlin, D., Hoffman, J. J. & Lamont, B. T. (1994). Porter’s Generic Strategies, Dynamic Environments, And Performance: A Profile Deviation Fit Perspective, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 2 (2), 155-175.
• McKee, D. O., Varadarajan, P. R. & Pride, W. M. (1989). Strategic Adaptability And Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective. Journal of Marketing 53 (July), 21-35.
• Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1175–1195.
• Miles, M. P., Covin, J. G. ve Heeley, M. B. (2000). The Relationship Between Environmental Dynamism And Small Firm Structure, Strategy, And Performance, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8 (2): 63-74
• Miles, R., Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure And Process, New York: McGraw-Hill. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C. (1984). Fit, Failure And Hall Of Fame, California Management Review, 27 (3), 10-28.
• Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards A Synthesis, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 233-249.
• Miller, D. (1987). Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and İmplications For Performance, Academy Of Management Journal, 30 (1), 7-32.
• Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis And Performance İmplications, Academy Of Management Journal, 31 (2), 280-308.
• Miller, D. (1992). Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit, Organization Science, 3 (2): 159-178.
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring Of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Nakip, M. (2006). Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Teknikler ve (SPSS Destekli) Uygulamalar (2. Basım), Ankara: Seçkin.
• Naktiyok, A., Karabey, C.N. (2007). İşletmelerin Maddi Olmayan Kaynakları ve Çevresel Olumsuzluk Algıları İle Stratejik Yönelimleri Arasındaki İlişki, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 62 (4), 203-225.
• Nystroma, P. C., Ramamurthya, K. & Wilson, A. L. (2002). Organizational Context, Climate And Innovativeness: Adoption Of İmaging Technology, Journal Of Engineering and Technology Management, 19 (3–4), 221–247.
• Ogollah, K.; Bolo, A. Z. & Ogutu, M. (2011). Strategy Structure Environment Linkage And Corporate Performance: A Conceptual Overview, Business Administration And Management (BAM), 1(3), 101-113, Www.Primejournal.Org/Bam (Erişim Tarihi: 30.08.2011).
• Olson, E.M.; Slater, F.F. & Hult, T.M. (2005). The Performance İmplication Of Fit Among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior, Journal Of Marketing, 69, 49-65.
• Özen, Ş. (2013). Yönetim ve Organizasyon Yaz Seminerleri-YÖYSEM, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, http:// www.academia.edu/4074295/Yonetim_ve_Organizasyon_Yaz_Seminerleri_25_Haziran_2013_ Akdeniz_Universitesi_Antalya, Erişim tarihi: 25.06.2013.
• Öztürk, B. (2008). Makroekonomik Faktörlerin İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası Ulusal-100 Endeksi Ve Volatilitesi Üzerindeki Etkilerinin İncelenmesi (1997-2006), (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Parker, S. C., Witteloostuijin, A. V. (2010). A General Framework For Estimating Multidimensional Contingency Fit, Organization Science, 21 (2), 540- 553.
• Parnell, J. A., Wright, P., & Tu, H. S. (1996). Beyond The Strategy-Performance Linkage: The İmpact Of The Strategy-Organization-Environment Fit On Business Performance, American Business Review, 14 (2), 41-50.
• Pertusa-Ortega, E.M., Claver-Cortes, E. & MolinaAzorin, J. F. (2008). Strategy, Structure, Environment And Performance İn Spanish Firms, Euromed Jornal Of Business, 3 (2), 223-239.
• Peteraf, M., Reed, R. (2007). Managerial Discretion and Internal Alignment Under Regulatory Constraints And Change, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1089-1112.
• Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy, Newyork: The Free Press.
• Priem, R. L. (1990). CEO Decision Rules For StrategyStructure-Environment Alignment, Configuration Outcomes, And Firm Performance, Phd Thesis, Arlington: The University Of Texas.
• Rajapakshe, W. (2002). Strategy And Structure ReExamined, Journal of Managemenet Science, 1 (1&2), 142-167.
• Roca-Puig, V., Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2007). Organizational Fit And Performance in Miles And Snow’s Configurational Theory, A Covariant Analysis, Management Research, 5 (1), 17–28.
• Sarvan, F.; Durmuş, A. E.; Özen, J.; Özdemir, B. & Tarcan, İ. E. (2003). On Stratejik Yönetim Okulu: Biçimleşme Okulunun Bütünleştirici Çerçevesi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İIBF Dergisi, 3(6), 73-122.
• Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems With Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden Within The Language Of Contingency Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349 – 377.
• Segev, E. (1987). Strategy, Strategy-Making, And Performance İn A Business Game, Strategic Management Journal, 8 (6), 565-577.
• Selto, F. H., Renner, C. J. & Young, S. M. (1995). Assesing The Organizational Fit Of A Just-In-Time Manufacturing System: Testing Selection, Interaction and Systems Models of Contingency Theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (7/8), 665-684.
• Shortell, S. M., Zajac, E. J. (1990). Perceptual and Archival Measures of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types: A Comprehensive Assessment of Reliability and Validity, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 817-832.
• Tavitiyaman, P., Zhang, H. Q. & Qu, H. (2012). The Effect of Competitive Strategies and Organizational Structure on Hotel Performance, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24 (1), 140-159.
• TDK, (2013). Türk Dil Kurumu, Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. Tekin, M. (1992). Sanayi İşletmelerinde Verimlilik ve Önemi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 169-176.
• Tekin, M., Zerenler, M. (2005). Konya Otomotiv Yan Sanayiinin Rekabet Gücü Hakkında Bir Araştırma, V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, 25-27 Kasım 2005, 75- 81.
• Van De Ven, A. H. (1979). Review of Aldrich’s (1979) Book-Organization and Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (2), 320-326.
• Venkatraman, N. (1989), The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence, Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 423-444.
• Venkatraman, N., Prescott, J. (1990). EnvironmentStrategy Coalignment: An Empirical Test of Its Performance Implications, Management Journal, 11 (1), 1-24.
• Vorhies, D. W., Morgan, N. A. (2003). A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit With Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance, Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 100-15.
• Vorhies, D. W., Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities For Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Journal of Marketing, 69 (1), 80-94.
• Wasti, A., Fiş, A. M. (2010). Örgüt Kültüründe SıkılıkEsneklik Boyutu ve Kurumsal Girişimciliğe Etkisi, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10 (1-2), 11-33.
• Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, London Oxford Press.