İnternet Sitelerinin İçerik ve Kullanılabilirlik Kalitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz İçerik kalitesi ve kullanılabilirlik düzeyi, günümüzdeİnternet sitelerinin en önemli sorunlarından biri olarakgörünmektedir. İnternet kullanıcıları kontrolü çok zorolan bu sanal ortamda yaptıkları bilgi taraması sonucundaulaştıkları verilerin doğru bilgi olup olmadığınıntespiti konusunda yetersiz kalabilmektedirler. İnternet,taşıdığı benzersiz özellikler dolayısıyla herkesin serbestçeulaşabildiği ve istediği her türlü veriyi aktarabildiğibir alan olduğundan buradaki mevcut bilginin kalitelive güvenilir olduğunu söylemek çok zordur. Bu sebepleözellikle bu konuda bilinçli ve bilgili olmayan kullanıcılaraçısından bu kontrolsüzlük doğru bilgiye erişimkonusunda ciddi bir tehdit unsuru olarak görünmektedir.Bu makale çalışması internet kullanıcılarının hembu probleminin çözümüne yönelik bir yöntem önermekhem de internet sitelerinin kullanılabilirlik düzeyini belirleyebilmekamacıyla yazılmıştır.Çalışmanın birinci bölümünde İnternet üzerindeki enformasyonkalitesinin belirlenememesi problemine değinilmiştir.Sanal ortamdaki enformasyonun çeşitliliği vekalite belirsizliğinin yaratabileceği sorunlar öne çıkarılmıştır.İkinci bölümde bu soruna ilişkin yapılan literatürtaraması sonucunda ulaşılmış internet site kalitesiölçümleme modelleri anlatılmıştır. Üçüncü bölümde isebir önceki bölümde anlatılan kalite ölçme yöntemlerininyetersiz kaldığı noktalar vurgulanarak yeni bir kalite değerlendirmemodelinin gerekliliği üzerinde durulmuştur.Son bölümde ise önerilen yeni kalite ölçümleme modelikullanılarak, araştırma örneklemi olarak seçilen internetsiteleri değerlendirilmiş ve bu değerlendirme sonucundaçeşitli bulgular elde edilerek, tespit edilen kalite problemlerineyönelik çözüm önerileri sunulmaya çalışılmıştır.

___

  • Abels, E., Whıte, M., Hahn, K. (1997). Identifying user -based criteria for Web pages, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applicationsand Policy, 7(4), ss. 252-262.
  • Ak, Oğuz. (1999). İnternet Okurluğunda Seçicilik, http://buelc.boun.edu.tr/ebulten/sayi07/internet_ okurlu%C4%9Fu.htm,
  • Aktan, C. Can ; Vural , İ. Yaşar. (2009), Bilgi Nedir?, http://www.canaktan.org/yeni-trendler/bilgi-yonetimi/bilgi-nedir.htm Al, U.; Al, P. (2011). Elektronik Bilgi Kaynaklarının Seçimi, http://acikarsiv.hacettepe.edu.tr/brow- se/11281/selectionofe-resources.pdf
  • Alexander, J.; Tate, M. Ann. (2008). How to Recognize an Informational Web Page, http://www.widener. edu/libraries/wolfgram/evaluate
  • Alexander, Janet E., Tate, Marsha Ann. (1999). Web Wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the web, Mahwah New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass
  • American Library Association. (2011). Great Web Sites for Kids Selection Criteria, http://www.ala.org/ala/ mgrps/divs/alsc/greatwebsites/greatwebsitesfor- kids/greatwebsites.cfm
  • Arnone, M., Small, R. (2008). WebSite Investigator, http://www.docstoc.com/docs/67924885/Website- Investigator---Marilyn-P-Arnone
  • AU Digital Reference Centre. (2009). Internet Searc- hing: How to Evaluate Information Found on the Internet. http://library.athabascau.ca/drc/evaluate. htm
  • Auer, Nicole J. (2008). Checklist for Evaluating Web Resources, http://library.usm.maine.edu/research/ researchguides/webeval.php
  • Aytaç, S. (2008). Türk Yazmaları İçin Web Erişimli Sayısal Arşivlerin Önemi, http://ab.org.tr/ab02/tam- metin/11.doc
  • Baıley, J.E., Pearson, S.W. (1983). Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing User Satisfaction, Management Science,29(5), ss. 530-545
  • Barnes, Stuart J., Vidgen, Richard T. (2008). An Integrative Approach To The Assessment Of E-Commerce Quality, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ summary?doi=10.1.1.96.8890
  • Beck, Susan. (1997). “Evaluation Criteria.” The Good, The Bad & The Ugly: or, Why It’s a Good Idea to Evaluate Web Sources, http://lib.nmsu.edu/ins- truction/evalcrit.html
  • Berger, P. (2008). Web Evaluation - Because Anyone Can Publish on the Web!, www.infosearcher.com/ infosearcher/articles/evaluatingweb1.pdf Brandt, Scott D. (2010). Evaluating Information one the Internet, http://www.lib.purdue.edu/research/tech- man/evaluate.html
  • Burgess, M. (2010). Data Quality –What is it, and do we agree? , http://www.dmsg.bcs.org/web/ima- ges/stories/PDFs/where%20did%20it%20all%20 go%20wrong%20-%20mikhaila%20burgess.pdf
  • Burns, S. (2008). Web Site Evaluation Worksheet, http:// www.pace.edu/library/instruct/webevalworksheet. htm
  • Carol, A.; Calero, C.; Caballero, I.; Piattini, M. (2009). Defining a Data Quality Model for Web Portals, www.springerlink.com/index/5860171513r86870. pdf
  • Cebeci, Z., Bek, Y. (2006). İnternet Bilgi Kaynaklarının Kalitesi: Değerlendirme Ölçütleri, http://www. cu.edu.tr/fakulteler/zf/zb/bgabd/documents/zce- beci/tik4/intbilkalite.htm , 13-15 Kasım 1999, IV. İnternet Konferansı
  • Cebeci, Z.; Bek, Y (2011). Internet Bilgi Kaynaklarının Kalitesi: Değerlendirme Ölçütleri, http://www. cu.edu.tr/fakulteler/zf/zb/bgabd/documents/zce- beci/tik4/intbilkalite.htm
  • Chan, M. (2005). Website Usability: A Comparative Study of American, British and Hong Kong University Websites Chopra, K.; Wallace, W. A. (2008), Trust in Electronic Environments, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/view- doc/summary?doi=10.1.1.3.8243
  • Culnan, Mary J. (2008). The Dimensions of Accessibility to Online Information: Implications for Implementing Office Information Systems, http://portal.acm. org/citation.cfm?id=523
  • Dann, Z.; Barclay, I. (2011). Complexity Theory and Knowledge Management Application, http://www. scribd.com/doc/35780955/Complexity-Theory- and-Knowledge-Management-Application
  • Dedeke, A. (2000). A conceptual framework for developing quality measures for information systems, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Quality
  • Delone, W.H., Mclean E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: the Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research,3(1), ss. 60-95
  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı – Bilgi Toplumu Dairesi (2010). Kamu Kurumları İnternet Sitesi Kılavuzu, http://www.bilgitoplumu.gov.tr/Documents/1/2005_Eylem_Plani/060800_Eylem38.pdf
  • Djajadikerta, H.; Trireksani, T. (2006). Measuring Uni- versity Web Site Quality: A Development of a User- Perceived Instrument and its Initial Implementation to Web sites of Accounting Departments in New Zealand’s Universities, School of Accounting, Finance and Economics & FIMARC Working Paper Series
  • Dondıo, P., Barrett, S. (2009). Computational Trust in Web Content Quality: A Comparative Evalutation on the Wikipedia Project, http://citeseerx.ist.psu. edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.159.4166
  • Dong, X. (2008). Searching Information and Evaluation of Internet: AChineseAcademicUser Survey, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1057231703000171
  • EGM Güvenlik. (2011) SSL (Güvenlik) Sertifikası Nedir?. http://www.egmguvenlik.com/SSL-Guvenlik- Sertifikasi-Nedir,DP-7.html
  • Eppler, M., Muenzenmayer, P. (2002). Measuring information quality in the web context: A survey of state-of-the-art instruments and an application methodology. Proceedings of the 7 International Conference on Information Quality (ICQ-02).
  • Eppler, Martin J. (2006). Managing Information Quality, ISBN-10 3-540-31408-3 Springer Berlin Heidelberg NewYork, Second Edition Evaluating Science WWW Resources, http://www. ncsu.edu/imse/3/evalweb.htm
  • Fritch, John W., Cromwell, Robert L. (2010). Evaluating Internet Resources: Identity, Affiliation, and Cognitive Authority in a Networked World, http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.1081/abs- tract
  • Gençer, M. (2006). Türkiye İnternet Sitelerinde Standartlara Uyumluluk: Karşılaştırmalı Ölçümler ve Stratejik Açılımlar, Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı
  • Gendron, M., Shanks, G. (2009). The Categorical Information Quality Framework (CIQF): A Critical Assessment and Replication Study, http://aisel.aisnet. org/pacis2003/43/
  • Gertz, M.; Özsu, T.; Saake, G.; Sattler, K. (2011). Data Quality on the Web, http://www.docstoc.com/ docs/76774602/Data-Quality-on-the-Web
  • Grassian, E. (2010). Thinking Critically about World Wide Web Resources, http://www.library.ucla.edu/ libraries/college/11605_12337.cfm
  • Grımes, Deborah J., Boenıng, Carl H. (2008). Worries with the Web: A Look at Student Use of Web Resources, http://crl.acrl.org/content/62/1/11.full.pdf
  • Harrıs, R. (2008). Evaluating Internet Research Sources, http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm
  • İskeçeli, M. (2010). Enformasyon Bilimi, http:// tk.kutuphaneci.org.tr/index.php/tk/article/ view/578/1156
  • Kahn, K.B., Strong, D., Wang, R. (2008). Information Quality Benchmarks: Product and Service performance. Communications of the ACM, http://portal.acm.org
  • Kapoun, J. (1998). Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction, C&RL News (July/August 1998), 522-523
  • Kapoun, J. (2008). Five Criteria for Evaluating The Web, http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/ webcrit.html
  • Katerattanakul, P., Sıau, K. (2008). Measuring information quality of web sites: Development of an instrument. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Information Systems. Charlotte, North Carolina, USA: 279-285., http://portal.acm. org/citation.cfm?id=352951
  • Kent State University Library (2008). Web Site Evaluation, http://www.library.kent.edu/page/10475
  • Kılıç, E.; Güngör, Z. (2008). web site tasarımlarımlarında kullanılabilirlik değerlendirme yöntemlerinin önemi, http://ab.org.tr/ab06/bildiri/154.doc
  • Kırk , Elizabeth E. (2009). Evaluating Information Found on the Internet, http://guides.library.jhu.edu/ evaluatinginformation
  • Klein, B. D. (2008). When do users detect information quality problems on the World Wide Web? , American Conference in Information Systems (2002). http://melody.syr.edu/hci/amcis02_minitrack/ RIP/Klein.pdf
  • Knıght, S.; Janıce, B. (2005). Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web, Informing Science Journal, Volume 8
  • Kurbanoğlu, S. (2009). WWW Bilgi kaynaklarının değerlendirilmesi, Hacettepe Üniversiteli Edebiyat Dergisi, Cilt:19, Sayı:1, ss.11-25.
  • Lederer, N. (2008). How to Evaluate A Web Page, http:// lib.colostate.edu/howto/evalweb.html
  • Leung, Hareton K.N. (2008). Quality metrics for intranet applications. Information & Management, 38(3): 137 – 152., http://www.sciencedirect. com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VD0- 41N5GN8-2&_user=691224&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_ orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_url- Version=0&_userid=691224&md5=97ce9a1b33b2 43390f0e312d13767067
  • Leung, Hareton K.N., (2010). Quality metrics for internet applications, http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0378720600000604
  • Lıu, Z. (2009). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the web, www.elsevier.com/locate/ infoproman
  • Lıu, Z., Huang, X. (2005). Evaluating the credibility of scholarly information on the web: A cross cultural study. ScienceDirect, 37(2):99-106
  • Loiacono, E. T.; Watson, R.T.; Goodhue, D. L. (2008). WebQualTM: A Measure of Web Site Quality, http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
  • Lundholm, M. (2004). Web Evaluation Framework Within A Rhetorical Perspective, Master Thesis, VID Göteborgs Unıversıtet, 2004-11-02
  • Mason, R.O. (1978). Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems Approach, Information Processing and Management, 1(5), ss. 219-234
  • Matheus, A., College, M. (2004). Web Design Quality Versus Web Information Quality, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04)
  • Moustakis, V. S.; Litos, C. Dalivigas, A.; Tsironis, L. (2004). Website Quality Assessment Criteria, Pro-ceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04)
  • Multnomah County Library (2008). Evaluating websites, http://www.multcolib.org/homework/webeval. html
  • Naumann, F., Rolker C. (2008). Assessment methods for the information quality criteria, http://www.fzi.de/ dbs/publications/rolker/IQ2000.pdf, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Quality
  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston
  • Oğuz, Y. (2007). İnternet ve Tıp Alanında Dolaşan Bilginin Güvenilirliği, http://inet-tr.org.tr/inetconf3/ bildiriler/tipalani.htm
  • Olıver, K. M., Wılkınson, G. L., Bennett, L. T. (2009). Evaluating the Quality of Internet Information Sources, .http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/ detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_Se archValue_0=ED412927&ERICExtSearch_ SearchType_0=no&accno=ED412927
  • P.F. Anderson, N. Allee, S. Grove, & S. Hill. (2011). Webeval: Consumer Health Web Sıte Evaluatıon Checklıst, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pfa/ mlaguide/free/webeval.pdf
  • Pacıfıcı, Sabrina I. (2008). Features - Getting It Right: Verifying Sources on the Net, http://www.llrx.com/ features/verifying.htm
  • Parker, M. B., Moleshe, V., De la Harpe, R. and Wills, G. B. (2006). An evaluation of Information quality frameworks for the World Wide Web. In: 8th Annual Conference on WWW Applications, 6-8th September 2006, Bloemfontein, Free State Province, South Africa
  • Schrock, K. (2009). Critical Evaluation of a Weblog, http://discoveryschool.com/schrockguide
  • Shanks, G., Corbıtt, B. (1999). Understanding Data Quality: Social and Cultural Aspects, Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems Sharkey, J. (2008). In-depth evaluation of provided sites, http://www.lib.purdue.edu/InternetEval
  • Smıth, A. (2008). Criteria for evaluation of Internet Information Resources, http://www.vuw.ac.nz/staff/ alastair_smith/evaln/index.htm#Breadth
  • Smıth, G.A. (2010). Testing The Surf: Criteria for evaluating of internet information resources, http://info. lib.uh.edu/pr/v8/n3/smit8n3.html
  • Strong, Diane M., YANG, W. Lee, WANG, Richard W. (2008). Data Quality in context, http://portal.acm. org/citation.cfm?id=253804
  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı (2007), Kamu Kurumları İnternet Sitesi Kılavuzu (Sürüm 1.0), http://bim.sdu.edu.tr/ docs/20070127-7-1.doc
  • Swısher, B. (2008). Finding and Evaluating Quality Information through the Internet, http://www.ou.edu/ itp/webhelp/internetinfo
  • T.C. Sayıştay Başkanlığı (2007). E-Devlete Geçişte Kamu Kurumları İnternet Siteleri, http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/rapor/rapor3.asp?id=64
  • Tavşancı S. (2011). Güvenilir Ve Sağlıklı İnternet Bilgisi- ni Nasıl Anlarız?, http://www.tavsanci.com/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=67&Ite mid=55
  • Tıllman, Hope N. (2008). Evaluating Quality on the Net, http://www.hopetillman.com/findqual.html Türksat A.Ş. (2010). Kamu Kurumları İnternet Siteleri Standartları ve Önerileri Rehberi, http://www.kakis.gov.tr
  • Tyburskı, G. (2008). ResearchWire - Publishers Wanted, No Experience Necessary: Information Quality on the Web, http://www.llrx.com/columns/quality. htm
  • Tyburskı, G. (2009). Criteria for Quality in Information—Checklist, http://www.virtualchase.com/qua- lity/criteria_print.html
  • Vanderdonckt, J., Beırekdar, A. (2009). Automated web evaluation by guideline review, http://citeseerx.ist. psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.2720
  • Warlıck, D. (2009). Evaluating Internet-based Informa- tion: A Goals-based Approach, http://ncsu.edu/me- ridian/jun98/feat2-6/feat2-6.html
  • Wıberg, C. (2003). A Measure of Fun:Extending the sco- pe of web usability, Printed by Print & Media AB, Umeå
  • Wikipedia (2011). Dünya Çapında Ağ Birliği, http:// tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%BCnya_%C3%87ap %C4%B1nda_A%C4%9F_Birli%C4%9Fi
  • World Wide Consortium (2011). CSS Validator, http:// validator.w3.org/
  • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2011). Fonts, www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#propdef-font- size
  • Zeıst, R.H.J. Hendrıks, P.R.H.(2009). Specifying soft- ware quality with the extended ISO model. Software Quality Management IV – Improving Quality, BCS: ss.145 -160
  • Zhang, P.; Dran, G. (2008). Expectations and Rankings of Website Quality Features: Results of Two Studies on User Perceptions, www.hicss.hawaii.edu/ HICSS_34/PDFs/INCRM01.pdf
  • Zhang, P.; GiselA M. (2000). Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers: A Two-Factor Model for Website Design and Evaluation, Journal of the American Society For Information Science. 51(14):1253–1268, S.1258
  • Zhilin, Y.; Shaohan, C.; Zheng Zhouc; N. (2010). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals, http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0378720604000734
  • Zhu, X, Gauch, S. (2000). Incorporating quality metrics in centralized/ distributed information retrieval on World Wide Web. Proceedings of the 23 international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Athens, Greece. rd,
  • Zhu, Y., Buchmann, A. (2009). Evaluating and Selecting Web Sources as External Information Resources of a DataWarehouse, http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=674094
  • Ziming, L., Xiaobin, H. (2008). Evaluating the credibility of scholarly information on the web: A cross cultural study, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1057231705000299
  • EK: https://drive.google.com/file/
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi