Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi ve Siyasal Olanın Güvenlikleştirilmesi

Bu çalışma, Kopenhag Okulu tarafından geliştirilen ve bugün için birçok alandaki güvenlik olgusunu açıklamada kullanılan güvenlikleştirme teorisinin temel varsayımlarını analiz ederek, teoriye yönelik eleştirileri ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca çalışma, teori üzerine geliştirilen eleştirilerin temel varsayımlarını mukayese ederek teorinin geldiği son noktayı ortaya koymaya çalışacaktır. Bunun yanında, özellikle teorinin genel varsayımlarını ve eleştirileri en geniş şekilde ortaya koyan herhangi bir çalışmanın Türkçe literatürde olmadığı göz ününe alındığında, Türkiye’deki yapılacak güvenlikleştirme çalışmaları için anahtar bir öneme sahip olacaktır.

Securitization Theory and Securitization of the Political

This study addresses the criticisms directed at the securitization theory which has been developed by the Copenhagen School and is commonly used in explaining contemporary security issues. The present paper further discusses the main premises of those critics and discusses the state of securitization theory in wider social sciences. It should be noted that given the lack of Turkish-language works on the securitization theory, this article represents a key research in crıtıcally reviewing the discussions on general hypotheses and criticisms of the theory.

___

  • ABRAHAMSEN, Rita (2005) “Blair’s Africa: The Politics of Securitization and Fear”, Alternatives, Cilt: 30, No:1, ss. 55–80.
  • AÇIKMEŞE, Sinem Akgül (2008), “Kopenhag Okulu Realist Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Aktör, Tehdit ve Politika: Avrupa Güvenliği Üzerine BirDeğerlendirme”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Avrupa Birliği ve Uluslararası Ekonomik İlişkiler Anabilimdalı, Ankara.
  • ARADAU, Claudia (2004), ‘Security and the Democratic Scene: Desecuritization and Emancipation’, Journal of International Relations and Development, Cilt: 7, ss.388-413.
  • ARADAU, Claudia (2006), Limits of security, limits of politics? A response’, Journal of International Relations and Development, Cilt: 9, No:1, ss. 81-90
  • ARAS, Bülent ve Karakaya Polat, Rabia (2008), “From Conflict to Cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey’s Relations with Syria and Iran”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 39, Sayı 5, ss. 475-495
  • ARCHER, Toby (2009), “Welcome to the Umma: The British State and its Muslim Citizens Since 9/11”, Cooperation and Conflict, Eylül, Cilt: 44, No: 3, ss. 329-347.
  • ATLANT, Kristian ve Bruusgaard, Kristin Ven (2009), “When Security Speech Acts Misfire: Russia and the Elektron Incident”, Security Dialogue, Haziran, 1, Cilt. 40, ss. 333-353.
  • AYDIN, Mustafa (2003), “Securitization of History and Geography; Understanding of Security in Turkey”, Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Cilt: 3, No: 2, Mayıs, ss. 163–184.
  • AYSEVER, R. Levent (2006), “Derrida ve Söz Edimleri Kuramı”, Cogito, No 47-48, Yaz-Güz, s. 287-333.
  • BALZACQ, Thierry (2005), “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 11, No: 2, Haziran 2005, ss. 171-201.
  • BALZACQ, Thierry (2008), “The Policy Tools of Securitization: Information Exchange, EU Foreign and Interior Policies”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt 46, No 1,Ocak, s. 75-100.
  • BIGO, Didier (2002) “Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease”, Alternatives, Sayı: 27: 63-92.
  • BIGO, Didier, (2000) “When Two Become One: Internal and External Securitisations”, Morten Kelstrup ve Michael C. Williams (der.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration, Routledge, Londra, ss. 171-204.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, (2003)“Individual and Societal Dimensions of Security”, International Studies Review, Cilt: 5, No: 2,Yaz, ss. 203-222.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, (2007) “Making Turkey’s Transformation Possible: Claiming ‘Security-Speak’ not Desecuritization!”, South East European and Black Sea Studies, Cilt 7, No 4, Aralık, s. 555-571.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, (2008) “The Politics of Security and Secularism in Turkey: From the Early Republican Era to EU Accession Negotiations”, Dietrich Jung and Catharina Raudvere, (eds).,Religion, Politics and Turkey’s EU Accession, Palgrave, London, ss.139-156.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, (2008) “The Securityness of Secularism? The Case of Turkey”, Security Dialogue, Sayı: 9, No: 6, ss.593-614.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, (2010) “Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Yeni Açılımlar: Yeni Güvenlik Çalışmaları” Stratejik Araştırmalar, Cilt: 8, No:14, ss. 30-53
  • BİLGİN, Pinar, Ken Booth ve Richard Wyn Jones. 1998. “Security Studies: The Next Stage?” Nação e Defensa, No: 84, ss. 131-157
  • BİLİCİ, Mucahit (2010) “Islam, Migration and Integration: The Age of Securitization”, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, Mayıs, Cilt: 39, No: 3: ss. 314-315.
  • BONACKER, T. Braun, C. ve Groth, J. (2009), “The Impact of Civil Society's Human Rights Articulations on Securitization in Ethno-Political Conflicts. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, SHUR Working Paper Series, 200, http://shur.luiss.it/files/2009/10/shurwp02-09.pdf
  • BOOTH, Ken (1997), “Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist”, Keith Krause ve Michael C. Williams (der.), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, ss. 83120.
  • BOSWELL, Christina (2007), “Migration Control in Europe after 9/11: Explaining the Absence of Securitization”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt: 45, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 589-610.
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre (1991), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • BUZAN, Barry (1983), People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations, Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • BUZAN, Barry (2008), “The Changing Agenda of Military Security”, Hans Günter Brauch vd. (der.), Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century, Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, ss.553-560.
  • BUZAN, Barry and Waever, Ole (2009), “Macrosecuritization and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitization theory”, Review of International Studies, Sayı: 35, No:2. ss. 253-276.
  • BUZAN, Barry, Ole Wæver ve Jaap de Wilde (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • CEBECİ, Münevver (2007), “The EU’s Security Impact on Turkey: Democratization and Desecuritization,” Anne Deighton and Gerard Bossuat (eds.), The EC/EU: A World Security Actor?, Soleb, Paris. CESARI, Jocelyne, “The Securitisation of Islam in Europe”, http://www.euro-islam.info/ei/wpcontent/uploads/pdfs/the_securitisation_of_islam_in_europe.pdf
  • CEYHAN,, Ayse ve Anastassia Tsoukala (2002), “The Securitisation of Migration in Western Societies”, Alternatives, Sayı: 27, ss. 21-39.
  • COLLINS, Alan (2005), “Securitization, Frankenstein's Monster and Malaysian Education,” The Pacific Review, Sayı: 18, No: 4, ss.565–586.
  • DAVIES, Sara E. (2008), “Securitizing Infectious Diseases”, International Affairs, Cilt: 84, No: 2, Mart, ss. 295-313.
  • ELBE, Stephen, (2006), “Should HIV/AIDS be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security”, International Studies Quarterly, Cilt: 50, No: 1, Mart, ss. 119-144.
  • EMMERS, Ralf (2003), “ASEAN and Securitization of Transnational Crime in Southeast Asia”, The Pacific Review, Cilt: 16, No: 3, Ağustos, ss. 419-438.
  • ERIKSSON, Johan ve Erik Noreen (2002), Setting the Agenda of Threats: An Explanatory Mode, Uppsala: Uppsala Peace Research Papers.
  • FLOYD, Rita (2007), “Human Security and the Copenhagen School’s Securitization Approach: Conceptualizing Human Security as a Securitizing Move”, Human Security Journal, No: 5, Kıs, ss. 38-49.
  • GROMES, Thorsten ve Bonacker ( 2007), The Concept of Securitisation as a Tool for Analysing the Role of Human-Rights-Related Civil Society in Ethno-Political Conflicts, SHUR Working Paper Series, , http://shur.luiss.it/files/2008/10/shurwp05-07.pdf.
  • HANSEN, Lene (2000),“The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Cilt: 29, No 2, Haziran, ss. 285-306.
  • HANSEN, Lene (2011), “Theorizing the image for Security Studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 20, No: 10, ss. 1–24
  • HOLM, Ulla (2004), “Algeria: Securitisation of State/Regime, Nation and Islam”, Stefan Guzzini and Dietrich Jung (der.), Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research, Londra: Routledge, ss. 217–228.
  • HUGHES, Bryn (2007), “Securitizing Iraq: The Bush Administration’s Social Construction of Security”, Global Change: Peace and Security, Cilt: 19, No: 2, Haziran, ss. 83-102.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef (1995), “Migrants as a Security Problem: Dangers of Securitizing Societal Issues”, Robert Miles ve Dietrich Thranhardt (der.), Migration and European Integration: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion,: Pinter, Londra, ss. 53- 72.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef (1998), “The Question of the Limit: Desecuritization and the Aesthetics of Horror in Political Realism”, Millenium - Journal of International Studies, Cilt: 27, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 569-589.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef (1998), “Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, On the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 4, No: 4, Aralık, ss. 479-505.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef (2000), “The European Union and the Securitization of Migration”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt: 38, No: 5, Aralık, ss.751-777.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef (2006), The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, Londra: Routledge.
  • IBRAHIM, Maggie (2005), “The Securitization of Migration: A Racial Discourse”, International Migration, Cilt: 43, No: 5, Aralık, ss. 163-187.
  • JUTTILA,, Matti (2006), “Desecuritizing Minority Rights: Against Determinism”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 37, No: 2, Haziran, ss. 167-186.
  • KALİBER, Alper (2005a), “Securing the Ground Through Securitized Foreign Policy: The Cyprus Case”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 36, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 319-337.
  • KALİBER, Alper (2005b), “Türkiye’de Güvenlikleştirilmiş Bir Alan Olarak Dış Politikayı Yeniden Düşünmek: Kıbrıs Örneği” Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt: 2, No:7, Güz.
  • KALİBER, Alper ve Tocci, Nathalie (2010), “Civil Society and the Transformation of Turkey’s Civil Society and the Transformation of Turkey's Kurdish Question” Security Dialogue, Cilt: 41, No: 2, Nisan, ss. 191-215.
  • KARAKAYA, Polat, Rabia (2008) “The Kurdish Issue: Can the AK Party Escape Securitization”, Insight Turkey, Vol: 10, No: 3, ss.75-86
  • KARAKAYA, Polat, Rabia (2009) “The 2007 Parliamentary Elections in Turkey: Between Securitization and Desecuritization”, Parliamentary Affairs, Cilt: 62, No: 1, ss. 129-148
  • KARDAŞ, Tuncay (2006), “Security Governmentality in Turkey”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales.
  • KARDAŞ, Tuncay (2009) “Turkey: Secularism, Islam and EU”, in Tuncay Kardas, Stig Jarle Hansen and Atle Mesoy (eds.), The Borders of Islam: Exploring Samuel Huntington's Faultlines, from Al-Andalus to Virtual Ummah, London: Hurst & New York: Columbia University Press.
  • KARYOTIS, Georgios, (2004), “Securitization of Greek Terrorism and Arrest of the Revolutionary Organization November 17”, Cooperation and Conflict, Cilt: 42, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 271-293.
  • KAYA, Ayhan, (2010), Individualization and Institutionalization of Islam in Europe in the Age of Securitization, Insight Turkey, Cilt: 12, No. 1, ss. 47-63
  • KELLE, Alexander (2007), “Securitization of International Public Health: Implications for Global Health Governance and the Biological Weapons Prohibition Regime”, Global Governance, Cilt: 13, No: 2, Nisan-Haziran, ss. 217-235.
  • KNUDSEN, Olav F., (2001), “Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 32, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 355-368.
  • KRAUSE, Keith ve Michael C. Williams, (1996), “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods”, Mershon International Studies Review, Cilt: 40, No: 2, Ekim, ss. 229-254.
  • MATTI, Jutila (2006), “Desecuritizing Minority Rights: Against Determinism”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 37, No: 2, Haziran, ss. 167-185.
  • McDONALD, Matt (2008), “Securitization and the construction of security”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 14, No:4. ss. 563587.
  • McSWEENEY, Bill (1996), “Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 22, No: 1,Ocak, ss. 81-93.
  • McSWEENEY, Bill (1998), Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International, Relations,: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • McSWEENY, Bill (1999), Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge University Press, , Cambridge
  • MÖLLER, Frank, (2007), “Photographic Interventions in Post-9/11 Security Policy”, Security Dialogue,Cilt: 38, No: 2, ss. 179-96.
  • MURPY, Christopher (2007), “Securitizing Canadian Policing: A New Policing Paradigm For the Post 9/11 Security State?”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, Cilt: 32, No: 4, Kış, ss. 449-475.
  • ÖZCAN, Gencer (2006), “Türkiye’de Siyasal Rejim ve Güvenlikleştirme Sorunsalı”, İktisat, Siyaset, Devlet Üzerine Yazılar, Bağlam Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • PASHA, Mustapha Kamal,(1996), “Security as Hegemony”, Alternatives, Cilt: 21, Sayı: 3, ss.283-302
  • RICOEUR, Paul (2000), Söz Edimleri Kuramı ve Etik, çev. Atakan Altınörs, Asa Kitabevi, Bursa.
  • ROE, Paul (2004), “Securitization and Minority Rights: Conditions of Desecuritization”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 35, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 279-294.
  • ROE, Paul (2006), “Reconstructing Identities or Managing Minorities? Desecuritizing Minority Rights: A Response to Jutila”, Security Dialogue, Cilt, 37, No: 3 ss. 425-438.
  • ROE, Paul (2008), “Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures: Securitization and the UK's Decision to Invade Iraq”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 39, No: 6, ss. 615-635.
  • SASSE, Gwendolyn (2005), “Securitization or Securing Rights? Exploring the Conceptual Foundations of Policies towards Minorities and Migrants in Europe”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt: 43, No: 4, Aralık, ss. 673-693.
  • SAVVIDES, Philippos K. (2000), “Legitimation Crisis and Securitization in Modern Turkey’ in Middle East”, Critique, Cilt: 9, No: 16, ss. 55-73.
  • SEARLE, John R. (2000). Söz Edimleri: Bir Dil Felsefesi Denemesi, çev. Levent Aysever, Ankara: Ayraç Yayınevi.
  • SJOSTEDT, Roxanna (2008), “Exploring the Construction of Threats: The Securitization of HIV/AIDS in Russia”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 39, No: 1, Mart, ss. 7-29.
  • SRİTZEL, Holger (2007), “Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 13, No: 3, Eylül, ss. 357-383.
  • TANK, Pinar 2009, “Turkey's military elite at a crossroad: paths to desecuritisation?” Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Oslo Üniversitesi, Oslo
  • TOK, Gül Ceylan (2009), “The Securitization of the Headscarf Issue in Turkey: ‘The Good and Bad Daughters’ of the Republic”, Annual Review of International Studies, Cilt: 8, ss. 113-137
  • VAUGHN, Jocelyn (2009), “The Unlikely Securitizer: Humanitarian Organizations and the Securitization of Indistinctiveness”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 40, No: 3, Haziran, ss. 263–285.
  • VUORI, Juha A. (2008), “Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic
  • Political Orders”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 14, No: 1,ss. 65-99.
  • WAEVER, Ole (2008) “The Changing Agenda of Societal Security”, Hans Günter Brauch vd. (der.), Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century, Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, ss. 581-593.
  • WAEVER, Ole (1995), “Securitisation and Desecuritisation”, Ronnie D. Lipschutz (der.), On Security, New York: Columbia University Press, ss. 46-86
  • WAEVERA, Ole (2003) ‘Securitisation: Taking stock of a research programme in Security Studies’ Unpublished Manuscript, http://www.docstoc.com/docs/906178/securitization-diagram.
  • WEAVER, Ole (2004) “Aberystyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New Schools in Security Theory and Their Origins between Core and Periphery”, http://www.scribd.com/doc/40010349/Ole-Waever-Aberystwyth-Paris-enNew-Schools-in-Security-Theory-and-Their-Origins-Between-Core-andPeriphery
  • WILKONSON, Claire (2007), “The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe?”, Security Dialogue, Cilt: 38, No: 1, Mart, ss.5-25.
  • WILLIAMS, Kieran (2003), “Lustration as the Securitization of Democracy in Czechoslovakia and Czech Republic”, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Cilt: 19, No: 4, Aralık, ss. 1-24.
  • WILLIAMS, Michael C. (1998), “Security and the Politics of Identity”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 4, No: 2, Haziran, ss. 204225.
  • WILLIAMS, Michael C. (2003), “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitisation and International Politics”, International Studies Quarterly, Cilt: 47, No: 4, Aralık, ss. 511-531.
  • WILLIAMS, Mike (1999), “Comment on the Copenhagen Controversy”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 24, No: 3, Temmuz, ss. 435-441.
  • WOLFERS, Arnold (1952), “National Security as an Ambigous Symbol”, Political Science Quarterly, Cilt: 67, No: 4, Aralık, ss. 481-502.